tel. 310-556-3007

email > | linkedin > | facebook >
  • HOME
  • BIO
  • SERVICES
  • BLOG POSTS
  • CONTACT US
  • FAQ’S

NEW REPORTING FOR FOREIGN ASSETS UNDER IRC §6038D

Section 6038D was added to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) by the 2010 HIRE ACT. The new code section is generally effect for tax years beginning after March 18,2010.
Prior to the addition of Section 6038D, reporting of interests in foreign financial accounts was done on Treasury Form TD 90-22.1 (FBAR) which was required under the provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) as opposed to the IRC. The result was that the collection of penalties for non-compliance could only be accomplished through civil court proceedings which is far less efficient that the assessment and collection powers afforded the IRS under the IRC. Further, for reasons having to do with non-disclosure rules, the fact that a taxpayer made a disclosure of foreign assets on Schedule B of Form 1040, could not be disclosed to those who administer the FBAR rules under the BSA.
What IRC § 6038D does is impose a $10,000 penalty on a U.S. person (individuals, corporations, partnerships, LLC’s and trusts) who fails to furnish required information on a timely basis. If after notice and demand to furnish the information,the information is not provided within 90-days, the penalty increase by $10,000 for each 30-day period up to a maximum of $50,000.
A disclosure under IRC § 6038D must be attached to the current year income tax returns disclosing with particularity the interests held in “specified foreign financial assets”, (Required Information”). The disclosure is required if the value of the specified foreign financial assets exceeds $50,000 while the requirement of an FBAR filing is $10,000. There are other differences as well. While the information required is similar in content for both an FBAR and a disclosure under IRC § 6038D, the 6038D requirement covers more persons. Example: Under IRC §6038D(c) beneficiaries of a foreign trust may not have an FBAR filing requirement and yet still be subject to IRC §6038D. Take the case where a beneficiary of a foreign trust has less than a 50% beneficial interest, there is no FBAR filing required, but if the specified foreign financial asset value (the trust value) exceeds the threshold of $50,000, then the taxpayer must make a disclosure on his/her tax return under IRC § 6038D.
The fact that there are now two filing and notice requirements one under the BSA and one under the IRC in the short terms increases the likelihood of compliance problems and the possibility of tax preparer errors. It would seem a requirement that tax preparers become familiar with the provisions of IRC § 6038D and the penalties for non-disclosure. The burden of proof of exemption from filing is on the taxpayer. The conclusion for the tax preparer, is that when in doubt, disclose. If requested by the taxpayer not to disclose, then the tax prepare should consider the tax preparer penalties under Circular 230 and the risk of other charges being levied as well.

Tags: due diligence foreign assets reporting, FBAR, Penalties, preparer penalties, tax preparer penalities

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

BLOG POSTS

  • Foreign Assets; What Must I Disclose?

    Beginning with income tax returns for 2011, U.S. individual taxpayers must attach a statement (Form 8938) to their return if they hold an interest in “specified foreign financial interests” and the value of those interests exceed certain thresholds. Example for an individual the threshold is $50,000 at year end or $75,000 at anytime during the [...]

    more »

  • Offshore Assets and 2011 Disclosure a Volatile Mix

    The IRS Frequently Asked Question 47 which is part of the explanation of the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative has an ominous warning for taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts and more. FAQ 47 it directed to tax return preparers and provides as follows: I have a client who may be eligible to make a voluntary disclosure. [...]

    more »

  • FBAR Conviction of NJ MD Affect Dual Nationals

    On January 11, 2012 Michael Reiss, a physician from NJ was sentenced in for failing to report offshore (Swiss) bank accounts (11:CR:0068),United States District Court SDNY. The sentencing memos of the U.S make some important policy statements. The policy statements are: First, Dr. Reiss made no effort to enter the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) [...]

    more »

  • New Offshore Traps

    The U.S. uses a global approach to income and estate tax. Many of the other G-20 countries use a territorial system. The result is that U.S.taxpayers, are now faced with enhanced disclosure and enforcement issues. Form 8938 is required for U.S. taxpayers as part of Form 1040 whose aggregate “specified foreign financial assets” exceed specified [...]

    more »

  • HOME
  • BIO
  • SERVICES
  • BLOG POSTS
  • CONTACT US
  • FAQ’S

All content copyright Sanford I. Millar 2010. All Rights reserved.